همکاری با انجمن روان‌شناسی صنعتی و سازمانی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری سنجش و اندازه‌گیری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی و رئیس مرکز ارزیابی و سنجش کارکنان شرکت ملی نفت ایران، تهران، ایران

2 کارشناس ارشد روان‌شناسی صنعتی و سازمانی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، و مسئول طراحی مدل شایستگی مرکز ارزیابی و سنجش کارکنان شرکت ملی نفت ایران، تهران، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری سنجش و اندازه‌گیری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

 
موفقیت سازمان‌ها در دنیایِ همواره در حال تغییر، به ظرفیت خلاقیت منابع انسانی به‌منظور توانایی انتقال ایده‌های آنان به محصولات و خدمات جدید و بدیع وابسته است. هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی آزمون تفکر خلاق تورنس (پایایی و روایی) در مدیران و کارکنان یک شرکت صنعتی بزرگ بود. نمونه این پژوهش از طریق نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده و از میان کلیه افراد شاغل در شرکت که بین سال‌های 92 تا 97، در فرآیند مرکز ارزیابی، شرکت کرده بودند انتخاب گردید و در‌نهایت 615 نفر به‌عنوان نمونه،‌ مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. روش پژوهش توصیفی و از نوع ابزارسازی بود و از نمرات خلاقیت در آزمون تفکر خلاق تورنس به ‌همراه مصاحبه و فرآیند تمرین گروهی، جهت انجام تحلیل‌های مورد نیاز استفاده گردید. نرم‌افزارهای مورد استفاده در این تحلیل SPSS25 و Lisrel8.8 بود. جهت بررسی پایایی این ابزار، از روش‌های آلفای کرونباخ و تنصیف استفاده شد. همچنین،‌ جهت بررسی روایی سازه این آزمون از تحلیل عاملی استفاده شد. روایی همگرای آن نیز با نمرات خلاقیت مصاحبه و تمرین گروهی از طریق تحلیل همبستگی پیرسون، مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. یافته‌ها نشان داد که آزمون تفکر خلاق تورنس از روایی و پایایی قابل قبولی برای استفاده در محیط کار برخوردار است که استفاده از آن را برای سنجش میزان خلاقیت کارکنان در کنار سایر فعالیت‌ها مانند مصاحبه و تمرین گروهی توجیه می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometric Properties of Torrance’s Creative Thinking Test in Employees' Assessment Center of an Industrial Company

نویسندگان [English]

  • Majid Salimi 1
  • Mohammad Montakhab Yeganeh 2
  • Hassan Moshtaghian Abarghouei 3

1 PhD of Measurement and Measurement of Allameh Tabatabaei University and Head of assessment center in Nation Iran Oil Company, Tehran, Iran

2 MA of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, and Responsible for Designing The Competency Model of the National Iranian Oil Company Employee Evaluation Center, Tehran, Iran

3 PhD Student in Measurement, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction
Organizations' success in the ever-changing world depends on the human resource's creative capacity to translate their ideas into new and innovative products and services. The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of Torrance’s creative thinking test (reliability and validity) in employees of an industrial company.
 
Method
The sample of this study was selected by simple random sampling method from all the employees of the company who participated in the assessment center process between 2013 and 2018. Finally, 615 employees were
selected as the research sample.
 
Results
The research method was descriptive. Scores of Torrance’ creative thinking test, interview and group game processes were used for data analyses. The software used in this analysis were SPSS-25 and Lisrel 8.8. Cronbach's alpha and split-half methods were used to evaluate the reliability of this instrument. In order to investigate the construct validity of this test, confirmatory factor analysis was used, Also convergent validity through Pearson correlation analysis was concerned.
 
Discussion
The findings showed that Torrance’s creative thinking test had acceptable validity and reliability for using in the workplace that justifies its use to measure employee creativity alongside other activities such as interview and game group.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Torrance’s creative thinking test
  • validity
  • psychometric properties
  • assessment center
 
Abernathy Tannehill, R. L. (1998). An analysis of selected creativity tests administered to students affiliated with the Cherokee tribe. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(7), 25-26.
Afshari, A. (2013). Designing and testing a model of the relationship between individual, group an organizational factor with organizational creativity: considering the mediating role of creative self-efficacy and instrinsic motivation in employees of NISOC (Aghajari District). PhD Dissertation in Psychology. Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. (Persian)
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Componential theory of creativity. Harvard Business School, 76(5), 96-120.
Bahrami, Sh. (2018). The relationship of managers' sense of humor with organizational creativity: mediating role of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology Studies, 5(1), 85-102. (Persian)
Beshlide, K. (2017). Research methods and statistical analysis of research examples
using SPSS and AMOS
. Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University. (Persian)
Clapham, M. M. (2004). Structure of figural forms A and B of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 58, 275-283.
Ferrando, M., Ferrandiz, C., Bermejo, M., Sanchez, C., Parra, J., & Prieto, M. (2007). Estructura interna y baremacion del test de pensamiento creativo de torrance. [Internal structure and baremation of the Creative Thinking Torrance Test]. Psicothema, 19(3), 489-496.
Gonzales, M. A., & Campos, A. (1997). Mental imagery and creative thinking. Journal of Psychology, 131(4), 357-364
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Presidential address to the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454.
Guilford, J. P. (1962). Factors that aid and hinder creativity. Teachers College Record, 63,380-392.
Harari, M. B., Reaves, A. C., & Viswesvaran, C. (2016). Creative and innovative performance: a meta-analysis of relationships with task, citizenship, and counterproductive job performance dimensions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(4), 495-511.
Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2),191-196.
Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 3-14.
Kim, K. H. (2011). The creativity crisis: The decrease in creative thinking scores on the Torrance tests of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23(4), 285-295.
Krumm, G., Lemos, V., & Filippetti, V. A. (2014). Factor structure of the Torrance tests of creative thinking figural form B in Spanish-speaking children: measurement invariance across gender. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 72-81.
Luthans, F, (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. The Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 57-72.
Mashayekhi, N., Arshadi, N., & Neisi, A. (2013). Designing and testing a model of some antecedents and outcomes of organizational creativity. Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology Studies, 1(1), 51-72. (Persian)
Mumford, M. D., Hester, K. S., & Robledo, I. C. (2012). Creativity in organizations: Importance and approaches. Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 3-16). Norman: Academic Press.
Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. Handbook of creativity (pp. 35-61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Prabhu, V., Sutton, C., & Sauser, W. (2008). Creativity and certain personality traits: Understanding the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 20(1), 53-66.
Prieto, M. D., Parra, J., Ferrando, M., Ferrandiz, C., Bermejo, M. R., & Sánchez, C. (2006). Creative abilities in early childhood. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 4(3), 277-290.
Rezayee, S., & Manouchehri, M. (2008). Investigation of validity, reliability and normality of Torrance creativity test. Journal of Psychology & Education, 38(3), 47-68. (Persian)
Safaei Rad, I., Karimi, L., Ramezani, V., Ahmadi, M., Heshmati, R., & Jafar, E. (2010). Psychometric properties of Torrance test (Persian version) of creative thinking (A form). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5(5), 1429-1433.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T, I, (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). The torrance tests of creative thinking-norms-technical manual research edition-verbal tests, forms a and b- figural tests, forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1987). Teaching for creativity. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers in creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 189-215). Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.
Torrance, E. P. (1990). Te torrance tests of creative thinking norms—technical manual figural (streamlined) forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
Torrance, E. P., & Wu, T. (1981). A comparative longitudinal study of the adult creative achievements of elementary school children identified as highly intelligent and as highly creative. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 6(2), 71-76.
Yamada, H., & Tam, A. Y. W. (1996). Prediction study of adult creative achievement: Torrance's longitudinal study of creativity revisited. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 30(2), 144-149.
Zampetakis, L. A., & Moustakis, V. (2006). Linking creativity with entrepreneurial intentions: A structural approach. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(3), 413-428.
Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity?. Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 24-37.
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.