مطالعات روانشناسی صنعتی و سازمانی
همکاری با انجمن روان‌شناسی صنعتی و سازمانی ایران

طراحی مدل مفهومی انرژی کارکنان در محیط کار: یک رویکرد کیفی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

اسماعیل کاکه برایی 1
منصور ایراندوست 2
جمال ادهمی 3
رضا صالحی 4

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت رفتار سازمانی، گروه مدیریت، واحد سنندج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سنندج، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت، واحد سنندج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سنندج‌، ایران

3 استادیار گروه جامعه‌شناسی، واحد سنندج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سنندج، ایران‌

4 استادیار گروه آمار و ریاضی، واحد سنندج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سنندج، ایران‌

https://doi.org/10.22055/jiops.2023.43649.1352
چکیده
اخیراً رویکرد جدیدی در علم مدیریت ظاهر شده است که مربوط به روان‌شناسی مثبت است که از آن به‌عنوان دانش سازمانی مثبت یاد می­شود. محققان این حوزه به آنچه که افراد را قادر می­سازد در مواقع بحرانی انعطاف­پذیری بیشتری داشته باشند علاقه‌مند هستند. یکی از این مباحث، انرژی کارکنان است که به واکنش فیزیکی یا ذهنی افراد که به­صورت ارادی و یا غیرارادی نسبت به یک رویداد رخ می­دهد، تعریف شده است. بنابراین هدف از این پژوهش طراحی مدلی برای انرژی کارکنان در محیط کار است. از رویکرد کیفی تحلیل مضمون و بر‌اساس روش براون و کلارک برای شناسایی پیشایندها، پیامدها و ابعاد و مؤلفه­های مدل مورد مطالعه استفاده شد. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل کلیه مقالات و کتاب­های موجود در این زمینه بود که بر‌حسب نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. از روش مطالعات کتابخانه ای‌ شامل بررسی کتاب‌ها و مقاله‌ها برای گردآوری اطلاعات در زمینه مبانی نظری و ادبیات تحقیق مرتبط با موضوع پژوهش استفاده شده است. به‌منظور بررسی روایی از روش بازبینی توسط همکار پژوهشی و برای سنجش پایایی از ضریب پی اسکات استفاده شده است. نتایج کلی این پژوهش به‌صورت 64 مضمون پایه، 11 مضمون سازمان‌دهنده و 3 مضمون فراگیر استخراج شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که مضامین (ویژگی­های روان‌شناختی، ویژگی­های شغلی، سبک رهبری، ارتباطات اثربخش و سبک زندگی) به­عنوان پیشران‌های انرژی کارکنان (انرژی فیزیکی، انرژی احساسی، انرژی شناختی و انرژی معنوی) به‌عنوان ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های انرژی کارکنان‌ و پیامدهای (اولیه و ثانویه) به‌ عنوان پیامد­های انرژی کارکنان مشخص شد. متمرکز شدن بر مفهوم انرژی در سطوح مختلف در سازمان‌ها، اطلاعات ارزشمندی را در مورد وضعیت انرژی کارکنان در اختیار مدیران قرار می­دهد. در‌نتیجه هنگامی‌که سطح بالایی از انرژی کارکنان در یک سازمان وجود داشته باشد کارکنان با تلاش مداوم برای دستیابی به اهداف موجب برانگیخته شدن سایر اعضا می­شوند و این موضوع پیامدهای مثبتی را برای فرد و سازمان به‌همراه دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

انرژی کارکنان
محیط کار
پژوهش کیفی
تحلیل مضمون

عنوان مقاله English

Designing a Conceptual Model of Employees' Energy in the Workplace: A Qualitative Approach

نویسندگان English

Esmaeil Kakehbaraei 1
Mansour Irandoost 2
Jamal Adhami 3
Reza Salehi 4
1 PhD Candidate of Organizational Behavior Management, Department of Management, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Recently, a new approach has emerged in management science that is related to positive psychology and is called positive organizational knowledge. Researchers in this field are interested in what enables people to be more flexible in times of crisis. One of these issues is employee energy, which is defined as the physical or mental response people have, voluntarily or involuntarily, to an event. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to develop a model of employee energy in the workplace.
 
Method
The qualitative approach of thematic analysis (TA) based on the Braun and Clarke method was used to identify the antecedents, consequences, dimensions, and components of the model under study. The statistical population of the study included all articles and books available in the field, selected according to the principle of purposeful sampling method. The library study method, including the review of books and articles, was used to collect information on theoretical foundations and research literature on the research topic. The review method was used by a researcher colleague to check validity, and the P-Scott coefficient was used to measure reliability.
 
Results
The general results of this research were extracted as 64 basic themes, 11 organizing themes, and 3 overarching themes The results of the research showed that the themes (psychological characteristics, job characteristics, leadership style, effective communication, and lifestyle) determined as drivers of employees' energy, (physical energy, emotional energy, cognitive energy, and spiritual energy) were determined as dimensions and components of employees' energy, and (primary and secondary outcomes) were determined as consequences of employees' energy.
 
Discussion
Focusing on the concept of energy at different levels in organizations provides managers with valuable information about the energy status of employees. As a result, when there is a high level of employee energy in an organization, the employees will motivate other members by continuously trying to achieve the goals, and this issue has positive consequences for the individual and organization.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

employee energy
workplace
qualitative research
theme analysis
Alexiou, A., Khanagha, S., & Schippers, M. C. (2019). Productive organizational energy mediates the impact of organizational structure on absorptive capacity. Long Range Planning, 52(2), 155-172.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.02.001
Antonacopoulou, E. P., & Gabriel, Y. (2001). Emotion, learning and organizational change: Towards an integration of psychoanalytic and other perspectives. Journal of Organizational Change Management,‌ 14(5), 435-451. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005874
Atwater, L., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Leader–member exchange, feelings of energy, and involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 264-275.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.07.009
Bahrami, S. (2018). The relationship of managers' sense of humor with organizational creativity: Mediating role of positive organizational behavior (case study: sport and youth offices of staff Kermanshah province). Industrial and Organizational Psychology Studies, 5(1), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.22055/jiops.2019.27637.1102
Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Special Issue: Contexts of Positive Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.515
Bakker, W. E. (2019). Emotional energy, relational energy, and organizational energy: toward a multilevel model. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 373-395.‏ https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015047
Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644-675.‏ https://doi.org/10.2307/3094912
Bono, J. E., Davies, S. E., & Rasch, R. L. (2011). Some traits associated with flourishing at work.‏ The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarshi, Oxford Library of Psychology. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734610.013.0010
Borowik, R. (2014). Produtive organizational energy (POE) as a positive and dynamic power of organization. Wyższa Szkoła Zarządzania i Bankowości w Krakowie. 1-12. https://zeszytnaukowy.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/aa_Borowik.pdf
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bruch, H., Walter, F., & Voelpel, S. (2006). Charismatic leadership and collective mental energy: The mediating role of emotional energy and job involvement climate. In annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA.‏ https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/handle/20.500.14171/82604
Butt, T. H., Abid, G., Arya, B., & Farooqi, S. (2020). Employee energy and subjective well-being: A moderated mediation model. The Service Industries Journal, 40(1-2), 133-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2018.1563072
Cameron, K. S., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2011). The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship. Oxford University Press.‏ https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734610.001.0001
Cole, M. S., Bruch, H., & Vogel, B. (2012). Energy at work: A measurement validation and linkage to unit effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(4), 445-467.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/job.759
Collins, R. (1993). Emotional energy as the common denominator of rational action. Rationality and Society, 5(2), 203-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463193005002005
Cross, R., & Parker, A. (2004). Charged up: Creating energy in organizations. Journal of Organizational Excellence, 23(4), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/npr.20021
Cross, R., Baker, W., & Parker, A. (2003). What creates energy in organizations? MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 51-56.‏ https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Cuff, R. E. (2012). Exploring the validity of two organizational energy measures in the South African context. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria.‏ http://hdl.handle.net/2263/31312
Daly, A. J., Liou, Y. H., & Brown, C. (2016). Social red bull: Exploring energy relationships in a school district leadership team. Harvard Educational Review, 86(3), 412-448.‏ https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.412
Das, S. K., Mason, S. T., Vail, T. A., Rogers, G. V., Livingston, K. A.,. . . & Roberts, S. B. (2019). Effectiveness of an energy management training course on employee well-being: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Health Promotion, 33(1), 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117118776875
De Carlo, A., Dal Corso, L., Carluccio, F., Colledani, D., & Falco, A. (2020). Positive supervisor behaviors and employee performance: The serial mediation of workplace spirituality and work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1834), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01834
Derman, L. (2008). Organisational energy and individual well-being. Doctoral dissertation, University of Johannesburg. https://core.ac.uk/download/18216649.pdf
Dutton, J. E., & Heaphy, E. D. (2003). The power of high-quality connections. Positive Organizational Scholarship. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler.
Dyah, N., & Almahendra, R. (2016). The effect of social network, funding and productive organizational energy on the capability of organizational ambidexterity in research institution. Journal Siasat Bisnis, 20(2), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.20885/jsb.vol20.iss2.art1
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
Fritz, C., Lam, C. F., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2011). It's the little things that matter: An examination of knowledge workers' energy management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 28-39.‏
Gatezadeh, A. (2019). The effectiveness of positive thinking skill training on professional ethics and job satisfaction. Industrial and Organizational Psychology Studies, 6(2), 123-138. (Persian) https://journals.iau.ir/article_693295.html
Golparvar, M., & Vaseghi, Z. (2011). Mediating role of energy at work in connection between stress with creativity and organizational citizenship behaviors. Psychological Methods and Models, 1(4), 1-15 . (Persian) dor:20.1001.1.22285516.1390.1.4.1.5
Golparvar, M., Dehghan, S., & Mahdad, A. (2014). The role of big five personality factors in the relationship between job stress and emotional exhaustion and fatigue. Industrial and Organizational Psychology Studies, 1(1), 95-118. (Persian) https://jiops.scu.ac.ir/article_11300.html
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1974). The job diagnostic survey: an instrument for the diagnosis of jobs and the evaluation of job redesign projects. Washington, D.C.: Manpower Administration. https://doi.org/10.1037/t02285-000
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.‏ https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. United States: Psychological Assessment Resources. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.25.3.zol28
Kark, R., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Alive and creating: The mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 785-804.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/job.571
Klijn, A. F. J., Tims, M., Lysova, E. I., & Khapova, S. N. (2021). Personal energy at work: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 13(23),1-49. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313490
Kuada, J., & Serles, D. (2010). Creative human and organizational energy. Culture and creativity in organizations and societies. London: Adonis & Abbey.
Laughlin, C. D. (2018). Mana: Psychic energy, spiritual power, and the experiencing brain. Time and Mind, 11(4), 409-431.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/1751696X.2018.1541128
Liang, H. Y., Chu, C. Y., & Lin, J. S. C. (2020). Engaging customers with employees in service encounters: Linking employee and customer service engagement behaviors through relational energy and interaction cohesion. Journal of Service Management, 31(6), 1071-1105. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-06-2018-0175
Lykken, D. T. (2005). Mental energy. Intelligence, 33(4), 331-335.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.03.005
Mao, J. Y., Li, Y., Guo, L., Shi, Y., & Wang, J. (2022). Diminished relational energy: How and when co-worker incompetence accusations hinder employee creativity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(3), 383-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1979963
Owens, B. P., Baker, W. E., Sumpter, D. M., & Cameron, K. S. (2016). Relational energy at work: Implications for job engagement and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000032
Parent-Rocheleau, X., & Tremblay, M. (2020). Energy crossover from leader to followers: A time-lagged study of the effects of energy discrepancy and leader-member exchange. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 36(2), 135-145.‏ https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2020a13
Perttula, K. (2010). Passion for work: Initial measurement and construct validation. In Academy of Management Conference. Chicago, IL.
Quinn, R. W., & Dutton, J. E. (2005). Coordination as energy-in-conversation. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 36-57.‏ https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.15281422
Quinn, R. W., Spreitzer, G. M., & Lam, C. F. (2012). Building a sustainable model of human energy in organizations: Exploring the critical role of resources. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 337-396. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.676762
Russo, M., Shteigman, A., & Carmeli, A. (2016). Workplace and family support and work–life balance: Implications for individual psychological availability and energy at work. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(2), 173-188.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1025424
Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well‐being. Journal of Personality, 65(3), 529-565.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x
Salehi, S., piri, L., & shokrkon, H. (2021). The relationship between emotional intelligence and organizational entrepreneurship: Mediating role of job engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology Studies, 8(1), 133-150. (Persian) https://doi.org/10.22055/jiops.2021.33767.1190
Savadkouhi, S., Oreyzi, H. R., & Asgari, K. (2022). The effectiveness of the civility, respect & engagement in workplace (CREW) intervention on employees’ Relational energy and well-being well-being by controllingfor the extroversion variable. Journal of Applied Psychological Research, 13(1), 199-215. (Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/JAPR.2022.321762.643811
Schippers, M. C., & Hogenes, R. (2011). Energy management of people in organizations: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 193-203.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9217-6
Schuiuma, G., Mason, S., & Kennerley, M. (2007). Assessing energy within organizations. Measuring Business Excellence, 11(3), 69-78.‏ https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040710820764
Segerstrom, S. C., Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2017). The happy mind: Cognitive contributions to well-being. Springer, Cham, 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58763-9_11
Sepahvand, R., & Bagherzadeh Khodashahri, R. (2021). The impact of humorous behavior on employee work engagement with the mediating role of emotional energy. Organizational Behaviour Studies Quarterly, 10(1), 155-178. (Persian) dor:20.1001.1.23221518.1400.10.1.6.1
Shifrin, N. V., & Michel, J. S. (2022). Flexible work arrangements and employee health: A meta-analytic review. Work & Stress, 36(1), 60-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2021.1936287
Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2002). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 23(1), 3-25.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013419.ch1
Spreitzer, G. M., Lam, C. F., & Quinn, R. W. (2012). Human energy in organizations: Implications for POS from six interdisciplinary streams. The Oxford handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship, 155-167.‏ https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734610.013.0012
Sumpter, D. M., & Gibson, C. B. (2022). Riding the wave to recovery: Relational energy as an HR managerial resource for employees during crisis recovery. Human Resource Management, 62(4), 581-613. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22117
Tsai, W. C., Chen, C. C., & Liu, H. L. (2007). Test of a model linking employee positive moods and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1570
Vallerand, R. J., & Houlfort, N. (2003). Passion at work: Toward a new conceptualization. United States: Information Age Publishing. https://www.researchgate.net/post/
Vieten, L., Wöhrmann, A. M., Wendsche, J., & Michel, A. (2023). Employees’ work breaks and their physical and mental health: Results from a representative German survey. Applied Ergonomics, 110, 103998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.103998
Walsh, C., Knott, P., & Collins, J. (2020). Emotional energy and opportunity confidence. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13(3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00155
Young, H. R., Glerum, D. R., Wang, W., & Joseph, D. L. (2018). Who are the most engaged at work? A meta‐analysis of personality and employee engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(10), 1330-1346. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2303
مطالعات روانشناسی صنعتی و سازمانی
دوره 10، شماره 1
شهریور 1402
صفحه 137-158

  • تاریخ دریافت 13 اردیبهشت 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 10 آبان 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 28 مرداد 1402

صفحه اصلی

اعضای هیات تحریریه

همکاران دفتر نشریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

ارسال مقاله

داوران

تماس با ما