همکاری با انجمن روان‌شناسی صنعتی و سازمانی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت دولتی، گروه مدیریت، مؤسسه آموزش عالی طلوع‌مهر، قم، ایران

2 استاد گروه مدیریت رفتار سازمانی، دانشکده فارابی، دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران

3 دکتری مدیریت دولتی، گروه مدیریت، مؤسسه آموزش عالی طلوع‌مهر، قم، ایران

چکیده

فعالیت‌های عصبی تحت تأثیر روابط افراد است و اگر روابط خوبی بین افرد باشد، روابط مطلوبی نیز بین اعصاب شکل خواهد گرفت. به منظور بهبود عملکرد سازمان‌ها هدف از پژوهش حاضر شناسایی مؤلفه­های رهبری مبتنی بر علم اعصاب بوده است. این تحقیق‌ بر‌اساس هدف کاربردی و به‌ لحاظ نوع روش آمیخته است. جامعه آماری در بخش اول کلیه متون مربوط به رهبری مبتنی بر علم اعصاب است و در بخش دوم جامعه آماری خبرگان در حوزه مطالعاتی رهبری مبتنی بر اعصاب می‌باشند که تعداد 15 نفر از صاحب­نظران به روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند و با‌ توجه به ماهیت موضوع جهت تأیید مؤلفه‌ها از نظرات آنان استفاده شد. سپس جهت تعیین مؤلفه­های رهبری از آزمون تی تک‌نمونه استفاده گردید. بر‌اساس نظر خبرگان، 15 مؤلفه خلق چالش‌های جدید و تشویق به آن، همدلی، ایجاد فضایی برای تجربیات مثبت، رفتار اخلاقی در تصمیم­گیری، امیدبخشی، آزادی عمل، اعتماد متقابل، ارتباطات سازنده و صمیمی، شفافیت، حمایت‌گری، شور و شوق، ارائه بازخورد عملکرد، طراحی سیستم پاداش­دهی، قدردانی و عدالت شناسایی شدند. رهبری مبتنی بر علوم اعصاب با تحریک مؤلفه‌های ‌رفتاری منجر ‌به ترشح مثبت هورمون در مغز کارکنان می‌شود و در این شرایط شاهد بروز رفتارهایی مانند خلاقیت، مشارکت، تعهد و تعلق سازمانی و ارتقای هویت سازمانی و... هستیم و در ‌نتیجه نفوذ رهبر در قلب و رفتار کارکنان افزایش می‌یابد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identification of Leadership Components Based on Neuroscience

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatemeh Abbasi 1
  • Hasan Zareie Matin 2
  • Hamideh Abbasi 3

1 MA of Public Administration, Department of Management, Tolouemehr Higher Education Institution, Qom, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Management of Organizational Behavior, Faculty of Farabi, University of Tehran, QoM, Iran

3 PhD of Public Administration, Management Department, Tolouemehr Higher Education Institution, Qom, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction
Nervous activities are influenced by people's relationships and if there are good relationships between individuals, favorable relationships will also be formed between nerves. In order to improve the performance of organizations, the aim of the current research was to identify the components of leadership based on neuroscience.
 
Method
This research is based on the practical purpose and in terms of the type of mixed method. In the first part, the statistical population is all the texts related to neuroscience-based leadership, and in the second part, the statistical population is the experts in the field of neuroscience-based leadership studies, 15 experts were selected by purposive sampling and according to the nature Their opinions were used to confirm the components. Then, the sample T-Tech test was used to determine the components of leadership.
 
Results
According to experts, 15 components of creating new challenges and encouraging them, empathy, creating space for positive experiences, ethical behavior in decision-making, giving hope, freedom of action, mutual trust, constructive and intimate communication, transparency, support, enthusiasm and enthusiasm, providing performance feedback, designing reward system, appreciation and justice were identified.
Discussion
A leader based on neuroscience by stimulating the behavioral components leads to the positive release of hormones in the brains of employees and in this condition we witness the emergence of behaviors such as creativity, participation, commitment and organizational belonging and promotion of organizational identity, etc. and as a result the influence of the leader It increases in the heart and behavior of employees.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • leadership
  • neuroscience
  • neuroscience-based leader
Aboiron, J. (2022). Leadership seen by neuroscience. International Journal of Applied Research in Business and Management, 3(1), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.51137/ijarbm.2022.3.1.2
Ahmadi, K. (2017). Fundamentals of Neuroleadership (organizational leadership based on neuroscience). Tehran: Terme Publications.(Persian) https://www.termehbook.com/product/9789649787060/
Ahmadi, K. (2018). Neuroleadership and its capacities in organizational Evolution. Tahavol-e-Edari, 17(58), 54-69. (Persian) https://www.aro.gov.ir/fa-IR/PortalAro/
Akhwan, A., Shahbazi, M., & Naseri, M. (2016). Organizational change management. Elite Management Conference, Tehran 12/31/2016. (Persian) https://www.symposia.ir/ICMAE01
Amirnejad, G. (2016). The casual relationship of organizational leadership with organizational agility: the mediating role of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in employees of national Iranian drilling company. Industrial and Organizational Psychology Studies, 2(2), 105-122. (Persian). https://doi.org/10.22055/jiops.2017.23788.1063
Bass Bernard, M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. NewYork: Free press. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hrm.3930250310
Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2008). Neuroimaging as a new tool in the toolbox of psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(2), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00550.x
Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Lorig, T. S., Norris Catherine, J., Rickett, E., & Nusbaum, H. (2003). Just because you're imaging the brain doesn't mean you can stop using your head: A primer and set of first principles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 650–661. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.650
Cantor, D. S. (1999). An overview of quantitative EEG and its applications to neurofeedback. Ntroduction to Quantitative EEG and Neurofeedback, Academic press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012243790-8/50002-X
Derakhshan, M., Ghanbari, S., Zandi, K., & Saif Panahi, H. (2016). The relationship between authentic leadership and organizational transparency. Organizational Culture Management, 15(4), 767-788. (Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/JOMC.2018.133108.1006565
Hagmann, P., Cammoun, L., Gigandet, X., Meuli, R., Honey, C. J., Wedeen Van, J., & Spoons, O. (2008). Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biology, 6(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060159
Hosseinpour, Z., & Nadi, M. (2015). The relationship between organizational ethical culture and ethical decisions of managers and employees. The Quarterly Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 2(11), 95-104. (Persian) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085654
Jackson, P. L., Brunet, E., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2006). Empathy examined through the neural mechanisms involved in imagining how I feel versus how you feel pain: An event-related fMRI study. Neruopsychologia, 44(5), 752–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.015
Nolte, J. (2002). The human brain: An introduction to its functional anatomy. St. Louis: Mosby.
Reynolds, S. J. (2006). A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process: Implications for study and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 737–748. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.737
Sandi, Z., & Kiakojouri, K. (2021). The relationship of ethical leadership with ethical behavior: mediating role of perceived organizational virtuousness and moderating role of person-job fit. Industrial and Organizational Psychology Studies, 8(2), 343-360. (Persian) https://doi.org/10.22055/jiops.2022.39033.1252
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research Methods for Business Students. United State: Pearson Higher Ed. https://www.pearson.com/en-us/higher-education.html
Swart, T., Chisholm, K., & Brown, P. (2015). Neuroscience for Leadership (Harnessing the Brain Gain Advantage). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137466877
Zaccaro, S. J., Foti Roseanne, J., & Kenny, D. A. (1991). Self-monitoring and trait-based variance in leadership: An investigation of leader flexibility across multiple group situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 308-315. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.308