همکاری با انجمن روان‌شناسی صنعتی و سازمانی ایران

رابطه بین سرسختی روان‌شناختی و اشتیاق شغلی با کیفیت زندگی کاری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد علوم تربیتی-آموزش و بهسازی منابع انسانی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران

چکیده
پژوهش حاضر با هدف تعیین رابطه بین سرسختی روان‌شناختی و اشتیاق شغلی با کیفیت زندگی کاری در کارکنان بخش عملیاتی شرکت بهره برداری نفت و گاز گچساران در سال 1402 انجام شد. این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و روش تحقیق مورد استفاده توصیفی از نوع همبستگی و جامعه آماری مشتمل بر کارکنان عملیاتی شرکت بهره‌برداری نفت و گاز گچساران به تعداد 4000 نفر بوده است که از این تعداد با استفاده از فرمول کوکران تعداد 350 نفر به عنوان نمونه آماری با روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمع‌آوری اطلاعات سه پرسشنامه سرسختی روان‌شناختی کوباسا و همکاران (۱۹۸۲)، پرسشنامه اشتیاق شغلی شوفلی و همکاران (2002) و پرسشنامه کیفیت زندگی کاری والتون (1973) بوده است. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SPSS نسخه 21 و در دو سطح آمار توصیفی و استنباطی انجام شد. نتایج یافته‌ها نشان داد که بین ابعاد تعهد، کنترل و مبارزه‌جویی از سرسختی روان‌شناختی با کیفیت زندگی کاری (285/0-، 116/0-، 157/0-=r) رابطه معنی‌دار وجود دارد. بر اساس ضریب تعیین 5/2، 3/1، 1/8 درصد واریانس بین ابعاد تعهد، کنترل و مبارزه‌جویی از سرسختی روان‌شناختی با کیفیت زندگی کاری مشترک بوده است. بین ابعاد انرژی کاری، جذب کاری، وقف کاری از اشتیاق شغلی با کیفیت زندگی کاری ( 502/0، 509/0، 404/0=r) رابطه معنی‌دار وجود دارد. بر اساس ضریب تعیین 3/16، 9/26، 2/25 درصد واریانس ابعاد انرژی کاری، جذب کاری، وقف کاری از اشتیاق شغلی با کیفیت زندگی کاری مشترک بوده است. همچنین نتایج نشان داد که، از بین متغیرهای مورد مطالعه در رگرسیون بهترین پیش‌بینی‌کننده کیفیت زندگی کاری، مبارزه‌جویی بوده است. نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون گام به گام نشان داد که رابطه بین مبارزه‌جویی با کیفیت زندگی کاری معنی‌دار بوده است و از بین متغیرهای مورد مطالعه در رگرسیون بهترین پیش‌بینی‌کننده کیفیت زندگی کاری در گام اول جذب کاری و در گام دوم وقف کاری بوده است و بین سرسختی روان‌شناختی و کیفیت زندگی کاری بر حسب جنسیت، سن، مدرک تحصیلی و سابقه خدمت تفاوت معنی‌دار وجود ندارد. همچنین تفاوت نمرات اشتیاق شغلی بر حسب جنسیت، سن و سابقه خدمت معنی‌دار نیست اما تفاوت نمرات اشتیاق شغلی بر حسب مدرک تحصیلی معنی‌دار است.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله English

The Relationship of Psychological Hardiness and Work Engagement with Quality of Work Life

نویسندگان English

Mahbobeh Sadat Fadavi 1
fatemeh javad nia 2
1 MA Student in Educational Sciences‌-‌Training and Improvement of Human Resources, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Department of Educational Science and Psychology, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده English

 
Introduction
The present study was conducted with the aim of determining the relationship of psychological hardiness and job engagement with quality of work life in the employees of the operational department of Gachsaran Oil and Gas Exploitation Company in 2023. In terms of the applied purpose and the research method used, this research is a correlation type and the statistical population consists of operational employees of Gachsaran Oil and Gas Exploitation Company in the number of 4000 employess, of which 350 employess were used as a research sample using the convenience sampling method.
 
Method
The data collection tools were three questionnaires inchuded psychological hardiness of Kobasa et al. (1982), job engagement questionnaire by Shaffeli et al. (2002) and quality of work life questionnaire by Walton (1973), whose validity (face-content) was confirmed and reliability coefficients Questionnaires were calculated through Cronbach's alpha Data analysis was done using  SPSS version 21 software with two descriptive and inferential statistics levels.
 
Results
The results showed that there are a significant relationship between the dimensions of commitment, control and struggle of psychological hardiness with the quality of work life (r=-0.157, -0.285, -0.116). According to the coefficient of determination (2r), 2.5, 1.3, and 8.1 percent of the variance between the dimensions of commitment, control, and struggle of psychological hardiness were shared with the quality of work life. There is a significant relationship between the dimensions of work energy, work absorption, work dedication, work passion and quality of work life (r=0.502, 0.509, 0.404). According to the coefficient of determination (2r), 16.3, 26.9, 25.2 percent of the variance of the dimensions of work energy, work absorption, work dedication, and work passion were shared with the quality of work life.
 
Discussion
Paying attention to human motivation is of special importance in any organization. The main goal in the resource conservation theory is to have and use positive experiences or resources that can be more profitable and beneficial and have a positive effect on increasing the level of health. Therefore, having the right workforce and human resources can lead to better achievements.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Psychological hardiness
Job engagement
Quality of work life
Alizadeh Asli, A. (2013). Structural equation modeling approach in explaining the impact of psychological toughness on quality of life through the mediation of differentiation. International Conference on Humanities and Behavioral Studies, Tehran. (Persian) https://civilica.com/doc/331324
Aminpour, H., & Zare, H. (2013). Examining the psychometric properties of the stubbornness test and examining its differences among people with university education and those without. The first scientific-research conference on educational sciences and psychology of social and cultural injuries in Iran. (Persian) https://civilica.com/doc/367030
Azimpour, E., & Jalilian, S. (2018). Causal model of the effect of job toughness on teachers' job enthusiasm with the mediating role of innovative work behaviors. The Journal of New Advances in Behavioral Sciences, 4(31), 21-42. (Persian) https://ijndibs.com/article-1-306-fa.html
Bakker, A. B., & Bal, M. P. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. 83(1), 189-206. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X402596Citations
Beaudoin, L. E., & Edgar, L. (2003). Hassles: their importance to nurses' quality of work life. Nursing Economic, 21(3), 106-113. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12847983/
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). The job Demands–Resources Model of Burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
Di Tella, M., Tesio, V., Bertholet, J., Gasnier, A., Del Portillo, E. G., Spalek, M., ... & Franco, P. (2020). Professional quality of life and burnout among medical physicists working in radiation oncology: The role of alexithymia and empathy. Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 15, 38-43.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.07.001
Eidi, S. S., Zabihi, M. R., & Rezaeifar, H. (2018). Examining the relationship between the quality of work life and the vitality of employees with regard to the moderating role of job enthusiasm. The First National Conferemce on Humanities Development, Shiraz.‌ (Persian) https://civilica.com/doc/938801
Harizawi, A. (2016). Investigating the relationship between job stress and public health by controlling the variables of perceived organizational support and psychological toughness in shift and non-shift employees of an oil company. The third national conference of psychology and educational sciences, Shadegan. (Persian)  https://civilica .com/doc/623330
Kobasa, S. C., Maddi, S. R., & Kahn, S. (1982). Hardiness and health: A prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.168
Lakomý, M. (2019). The effects of prolonged working life on subjective quality of life across Europe. Social Science Research, 82, 33-44.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.04.011
Limbers, C. A., McCollum, C., & Greenwood, E. (2020). Physical activity moderates the association between parenting stress and quality of life in working mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 19, 100358.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2020.100358
Mazzetti, G., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2020). Same involvement, different reasons: How personality factors and organizations contribute to heavy work investment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH), 17(8550), 8550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228550
Movahedkhah, M., & Golparvar, R. (2018). Investigating the relationship between psychological toughness and quality of life with death anxiety in employees and workers of Kurdistan Cement Factory. International Conference on Research in Psychology, Counseling and Educational Sciences.‌ (Persian) https://civilica.com/doc/971638
Noami, A. Z., & Piriai, S. (2012). Relationship between academic motivation and academic engagement of students in high school in Ahvaz. Research in Educational Systems, 16(6), 29-42.‏ (Persian) dor: 20.1001.1.23831324.1391.6.16.2.9
Perangin-Angin, M. R., Lumbanraja, P., & Absah, Y. (2020). The effect of quality of work life and work engagement to employee performance with job satisfaction as an intervening variable in PT. Mopoly Raya Medan.‏ International Journal of Research and Review, 7(2), 72-78. https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR_Vol.7_Issue.2_Feb2020/Abstract_IJRR0010.html
Perangin-Angin, M. R., Lumbanraja, P., & Absah, Y. (2020). The effect of quality of work life and work engagement to employee performance with job satisfaction as an intervening variable in PT. Mopoly Raya Medan. International Journal of Research and Review, 7(2), 72-78. https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR_Vol.7_Issue.2_Feb2020/IJRR0010.pdf
Rahimi, R. (2006). Investigating the quality of work life of Isfahan University academic staff members. Thesis of Master in Educational Management, Isfahan University, Isfahan.
Saedi, S., Khalatbari, J., & Murray Najafabadi, N. (2010). Relationship between quality of work life and organizational health with job satisfaction. Journal of Modern Industrial/Organization Psychology, 1(4), 55-64.‏ (Persian) dor: 20.1001.1.28222476.1389.1.4.6.6
Sanei, M., & Moghimi, Z. (2013). Investigating the relationship between employee happiness and innovation in knowledge-based organizations. Development and Transformation Management, 6(19), 39-46. https://sid.ir/paper/522660/fa
Walton, R. E. (1973). Quality of working life: what is it. Sloan Management Review, 15(1), 11-21. https://www.sciepub.com/reference/180481
Zeyaaddiny, M., & Ramezani, S. (2013). Job enrichment and job engagement for propensity to leave of employees. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 4(15), 177-199. (Persian)  dor: 20.1001.1.22286853.1392.4.15.8.6
دوره 11، شماره 2
اسفند 1403
صفحه 47-58

  • تاریخ دریافت 12 آذر 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 03 مهر 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 17 آبان 1403